Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:33

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ethereum faces macro crisis: Can ETH’s $2K hold? – KEY insights reveal… - AMBCrypto
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How PTSD Disrupts Brain Cell Communication - Neuroscience News
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why is my Whirlpool fridge not cooling but the freezer works? What is the solution?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Has your mother ever walked in on you at an inappropriate time?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.